All posts tagged leadership

Leadership Lessons From Obama Addressing His Staff in 2008

“We’re going to have to be tougher, our game has to be tighter, I’m going to have to be a better candidate.”

I linked to this video a few years ago but it’s worth looking at again: Barack Speaks To HQ Staff & Volunteers

In this video, then-Senator Barack Obama is addressing his election staff & volunteer crew. He just won the Democratic Presidential Nomination and no longer battling other Democrats, he’s going to face down against John McCain and the GOP.

Regardless of your political affiliation or of your thoughts on the President’s performance in the past few years, its an objective fact that the Obama campaign was extremely well-executed. There were no major flaws, a lot of well run events, a lot of enthusiasm generated and a lot of grassroots efforts to actually get people to show up at the polls and vote.

Great campaigns typically have strong leaders and I think this video exemplifies how Obama lead. Look at how he focuses his attention on the staff’s efforts. How he appreciates the staff’s dedication, their commitment and paints the story of where they came from a few months ago, when they were down 30 points at the polls and he was fumbling at public events, to where they are now.

He shows his empathy for the volunteers – If you’re feeling burnt out, take some time off. I feel you. – but then brings them back to the task at hand – busting their asses and working essentially nonstop to win the overall election. He brings the focus to the wider world – a country with people who need help, help that (in their eyes) only the Obama team can bring. He reminds them of the legacy they have a chance to establish, that they can say they were a part of history.

He makes sure to touch on the various issues that he knows his staffers care about – the environment, Darfur (which I don’t think he did much about), education & the economy – which both shows his understanding of them and is a promise of what he will do if/when he gets elected.

I love when he says [my paraphrasing] – “You know, if we had lost in Iowa, it would have been ok. We would have a different Democratic nominee and would be putting our support behind them. But now that we are the nominated team, we have to win. We can’t lose.” It’s empathetic but tough.

A lot of great leadership lessons from this 13 min clip.

I am writing a book called Winning Isn't Normal. Check it out.

Related Posts:

Defeat is Not Due to Losses but to the Destruction of the Soul [quote]

I am sure that if every leader who goes into battle will promise himself that he will come out either a conqueror or a corpse he is sure to win. There is no doubt of that. Defeat is not due to losses but to the destruction of the soul of the leaders.

The most vital quality a soldier can possess is SELF CONFIDENCE–utter, complete and bumptious. You can have doubts about your good looks, about your intelligence, about your self control but to win in war you must have NO doubts about your ability as a soldier.

- General George S. Patton (in a letter to his son)

I am writing a book called Winning Isn't Normal. Check it out.

Related Posts:

The Unreasonable Man [quote]

The reasonable man adapts himself to the conditions that surround him… The unreasonable man adapts surrounding conditions to himself… All progress depends on the unreasonable man.

- George Bernard Shaw (Irish playwright and a co-founder of the London School of Economics)


This quote rings in my mind when I start to feel doubt about doing something that I strongly believe is right but might be considered irrational, foolish or unreasonable. Adaptation is a smart strategy much of the time and when you enter a new environment, is often the key to staying alive. But at some point you’ve got to put your foot down and force others to conform to your principles and vision.

Remember, progress is up to you!

I am writing a book called Winning Isn't Normal. Check it out.

Related Posts:

Why Chewing People Out For Mistakes is a Bad Idea

I had a conversation recently with a few friends about chewing people out for mistakes that I wanted to share.

My med school friend had been observing a surgery where the surgeon had asked a nurse to get a specific item from the storage closet for use in the surgery. When the nurse got to the closet she found that they had ran out of this particular item, so she had to go all the way across the hospital to retrieve the item. She rushed back quickly, but it still took about 10 minutes – which is an eternity during surgery when the patient is already “open”, because it increases the risk of infection.

After the nurse returned, the surgeon went off on the nurse, berating her for failing to get the item back sooner and threatening the safety of this patient – even though it was not her fault that the storage closet was not properly stocked (that job laid with some third person who was not present). The surgeon chewed out the nurse so hard that she started crying and had to leave the room for almost the entirety of the surgery – meaning the operating team had make do with one less person available to help.

Some disagreement ensues

I felt that the story really underlined the reputation that surgeons have for being assholes and that his behavior was destructive and uncalled for. Surprisingly, both my trader friend and engineering manager disagreed. Their opinion was that the nurse (who was not a newbie by any measure) should have double checked all the supplies prior to the surgery and by getting chewed out, she’d learn her lesson and never let this happen again. Thus, even though the surgeon brought the nurse to tears and caused her to be ineffective for the rest of the surgery, he ultimately did the right thing in terms of maximizing patient care in the long term.

I strongly disagreed with their assessment and spent some time unsuccessfully trying to explain why.

I was so distressed by this conversation that it’s still on my mind now and I decided to write this post. So here are the 4 reasons I feel that yelling, belittling, insulting, threatening, and otherwise chewing someone out for a mistake is a really bad idea.

1. Stress inhibits initiative/creativity and encourages mindless obedience

The number one issue I have with this situation is that the nurse wasn’t even in charge of stocking the storage closet. That was someone else’s job. The surgeon wanted the nurse to take extra initiative and double check the closet – which is a great thing to encourage.

But you can’t berate some into taking initiative.

Sure, they might double check next time, but in general, when you are afraid of making mistakes, you are unlikely to take initiative to try new things. This nurse is less likely to go above and beyond the call of duty – not more. As a data point: it’s been shown that innovation efforts struggle after a firm announces restructuring efforts (a known stressor).

If you want your people to take initiative, putting them under a ton of stress for “screwing up” is not going to work.

2. When you lose control, you lose respect

When you chew someone out – it is often because you are pissed off and unleash your anger on anyone who is involved in the situation (and sometimes even unrelated people!) When you lose control of your emotions as the leader or most senior person on the team – you lose the respect of your team. You lose credibility and you lose influence.

How are you supposed to have the discipline to make the tough-but-important calls when you can’t even discipline your own emotion?

If you’re upset, it says much more about your character if you can stay calm and collected when discussing then incident – which will earn the respect of your team, making them more likely to follow your directions in the future.

3. You breed resentment which leads to turnover & passive aggressive behavior

Besides inhibiting creativity, chewing people out and making them feel bad leads to resentment, which leads to a host of negative consequences. When you resent someone, you tend to resist helping them and look for little ways to screw them. I’m sure you’ve all seen this sort of passive-agressive behavior play out in your home or work. It is toxic – you don’t want that in your workplace.

Additionally, resentment leads to people quitting. This nurse had been working at the hospital for many years – she was no dummy and had a wealth of valuable experience that can make a huge difference for patients in many ways. But if she left due to resentment or just plain burn out, that is a net negative for the hospital and for patient care.

4. You don’t get to the bottom of the problem

When you yell at someone for making a mistake and simply tell them to “never let this happen again” you are demonstrating a lack of intellectual curiosity. Most problems don’t have simple solutions – or else they would have been solved already. You need to get to the root cause of the problem.

Instead of chewing people out, a better approach might be to use the 5 Whys – a technique developed by the founder of Toyota. As the architect of the Toyota Production System describes it:

“the basis of Toyota’s scientific approach . . . by repeating why five times, the nature of the problem as well as its solution becomes clear.”

Chewing people out assumes that the problem lies with their intelligence or motivation – and if that’s really the issue – you have a bigger problem on your hands.


I guess now I have to write a post about the right way to deal with mistakes or problems with people – that will come in time but in general, two good tips would be: ask a lot of questions and work hard to set clear and agreed upon expectations.

Chewing people out doesn’t work and it’s unprofessional. So don’t do it.

UPDATE – A med school friend of mine has written his thoughts on the surgeon’s behavior: Further Thoughts on Chewing People Out

I am writing a book called Winning Isn't Normal. Check it out.

Related Posts:

How Larry Page Returning to CEO Changes the Game for Google (link roundup)

Google is a company whose products pervade many aspects of my life. I’m running Google Chrome as my browser, I use Google search all the time, I check personal email from Gmail, I navigate with Google Maps. About the only thing I don’t do is use Android, Google’s smartphone OS, because I have an iPhone, but according to comScore 33% of all smartphone users do.

Larry Page has taken the CEO reins from Eric Schmidt of this giant company that seems to be everywhere and running businesses that do just about everything. I thought I’d use this week’s LINK ROUNDUP to take an overarching look at the situation and see what Page returning as CEO means for Google and the world.

We start with the official announcement on Google’s blog back in January. Relatively dry but a good starting point. The New York Times also ran a story that shed a bit more light on to the situation.

One of the big questions that people asked (and are still asking) is why make the change now? Google is doing well and there’s no obvious reason for Eric to move on. The New Yorker’s Ken Autella shares some insight onto the internal struggles (the China decision, among others) that may have triggered the move.

Danny Sullivan of Search Engine Land has been watching Google since the 90′s (so long ago, OMG) and takes a Larry Page (and Search Engine Land readers) on a tour of Google’s progress/new changes from 2001 (when Eric Schmidt started as CEO) to now across the various categories and offers some advice.

Steve Lacy, an engineer at Google from 2005-10 advocates returning Google to its startup roots and offers some more technical/internal changes that need to happen at Google (eg “Get rid of the proprietary cluster management system.”). This post also did well on Hacker News so it’s worth checking out the discussion there.

Of course, there’s lots of intelligent discussion going on at the social Q&A site Quora and this particular question: “What should Larry focus on how that he is CEO of Google?” garnered highly upvoted answers from Yishan Wong, a senior engineer at Facebook and Robert Scoble, the well-known blogger / voice in the Valley.

Finally, we look at some of the things that are already happening within the Googleplex. According to Venture Beat, Page started “cracking the whip” with senior management a few weeks before his start date and All Thing Digital reports that “major reorganization” has already begun as resignations are tendered and Page positions himself to be the center of all things.

BREAKING (4/8/11) This just in, via TechCrunch, Page has completed a reorganization of senior management, drawing direct lines of report from 6 areas including Search, Ads, Mobile, Youtube/Video and, most interestingly, Social. This area is so important that according to SAI, he’s actually tying 25% of the bonuses of everyone at Google to the performance in Social.

What are your thoughts in regards to the future of Google now that Larry Page is CEO? Is there any major news that I missed? I’d love to hear your thoughts in the comments.

I am writing a book called Winning Isn't Normal. Check it out.

Related Posts: